You are viewing [info]enchanted_pants's journal

enchanted_pants [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Be "The Bomb"

[ about me | vital statistics ]
[ old stuff | past entries to this journal ]
[ house rules | for reading & commenting ]

Links
[Links:| D.I.L. M.L.R.L. E.R.D. E.L.E. G.A.K. J.A.V.A. M.R.N. S.L.H.F. C.M.C. ]

2012 Baseball Predilections [Mar. 29th, 2012|03:46 pm]
"Poets are like baseball pitchers. Both have their moments. The intervals are the tough things."
- Robert Frost

Per annual tradition, what follows is my 2012 list of Major League Baseball teams in the order of my preference -- that is, when two teams play each other, I root-root-root for the team that is higher on the list.

This list is in no way predictive of the final standings. In fact, a thorough review of my prior record would probably yield an inverse relationship. Nevertheless, I hold out hope for an Oakland-Washington World Series. I also hold out hope for world peace and a delicious fat-free ice cream.

THESE ARE A FEW OF MY FAVORITE TEAMS

1. Oakland Athletics: Could be their last year on top of this list, after 25 seasons, for numerous reasons.
2. Toronto Blue Jays: Nothing like classic uniforms to get me back on board.
3. Washington Nationals: OK, I’m in. I’m not sure how the personalities fit together on this young and exciting team, but if anyone can figure it out, it’s Davey Johnson.
4. Pittsburgh Pirates: How great would it be to celebrate the end of their postseason drought at PNC Park? Or finish above .500? Or have more wins than the Steelers?
5. San Diego Padres: At least my brother’s adoptive team doesn’t have to worry about rainouts.
6. Detroit Tigers: This is the perfect beer-league team to give the Motor City’s its baseball renaissance. Remember, to err is human.
7. Tampa Bay Rays: Such an admirable organization, like the 1990s Atlanta Braves – I just want them to win a championship so people remember how great they were.
8. Milwaukee Brewers: Dinged a bit by the Braun fiasco, but still a good baseball town that deserves a winner.
9. Kansas City Royals: The team of tomorrow? Lots of good young players and I want to get in on the ground floor.

MEH, OKAY I GUESS

10. St. Louis Cardinals: Easier to like, now that LaRussa left and they’ve been spurned by Pujols.
11. Baltimore Orioles: I’m no Angelos fan, but since I can watch all the O’s games locally, it would be nice if they were at least interesting.
12. Atlanta Braves: I feel like I like this team more than their ownership does.
13. Cleveland Indians: Get rid of Chief Wahoo, and we’ll talk about moving you up on the list.
14. Los Angeles Dodgers: Jackie Robinson and Brooklyn history goes a long way.
15. Chicago Cubs: I like them all right but I actually kinda want them to keep sucking, so they don’t turn into the 2005 Red Sox.
16. Minnesota Twins: Their affiliation with my hometown Rochester Red Wings bumps them up at least five spots on this list.

THE "I JUST DON'T LIKE HIS FACE" DEPARTMENT

17. Cincinnati Reds: I’m a Joey Votto guy, but Dusty Baker sucks all the likeability out of this team.
18. Arizona Diamondbacks: We’re definitely into the “who cares” section of the list.
19. Colorado Rockies: Zzzzzzzz.
20. Seattle Mariners: Wake me when we get to the Phillies.
21. Houston Astros: I guess it will at least be interesting to watch their last year in the National League.

:P

22. Philadelphia Phillies: Enough of these guys already. Docked a solid five spots just for the ridiculously awful Ryan Howard contract.
23. Miami Marlins: Here’s a hateable team. Day-glo unis, Ozzie Guillen, Carlos Zambrano … any chance the ownership group includes Jennifer Lopez?
24. New York Mets: Sad to see Sandy Alderson slumming it with this motley group.
25. Boston Red Sox: It’s my hope that, at some point in the season, BAWBY VALENTINE and SCRAPPY PEDROIA get into a knife fight in the dugout.
26. Chicago White Sox: I know I’m already a very fortunate guy. Beautiful wife, good health, fulfilling job. But is it too much to ask for Hawk Harrelson to develop a watermelon-sized polyp on his larynx?

DIE IN A CHARTER PLANE ACCIDENT

27. New York Yankees: Duh. If you’re not a native New Yorker or descended from New Yorkers, and you’re a fan of this team, it means that you have no character.
28. San Francisco Giants: Just let the A’s move to San Jose, already, you assholes.
29. Texas Rangers: I might actually like this team, if it weren’t so Texan.
30. Anaheim Angels of Anaheim Anaheim: Pujols now? [Sigh.]
Link1 comment|Vent your spleen

Charge!, or Meeting Delta Upsilon (A hypothetical speech to my home chapter) [Oct. 17th, 2011|11:52 am]
It’s not easy being "Greek."

It may be that membership in a fraternity or a sorority once conferred some kind of nobility to a college student, but those days are over. Greek Life is a relic, pre-dating the ages of individualism and information-sharing, from a time before everyone technocratically self-selected their own insular groups, back when “elite” was still a compliment.

From the beginning it was a strange choice for me to join Delta Upsilon Fraternity. Despite a surfeit of fond memories and friendships, I remain even today a little conflicted about my decision. It has always been like that one jacket you have in the corner of your closet: it fits just a little funny and it doesn’t really
go with anything, so you only wear it out on certain occasions. But it keeps you warm and it has a lot of sentimental value, so you enjoy keeping it around.

As I sort out my fraternity experience, it always gets me to thinking about whether I put enough into it to get enough out of it, what I gained from it and what I can give back. Now, nearly a dozen years after my graduation, all I have to contribute are my thoughts about what the fraternity ultimately meant and means to me.

Every semester, for every ceremony in which the fraternal leaders initiate a new class of fraternity members, they dig up some old alumni to give a sort of commencement speech to the brotherhood – and the public, since Delta Upsilon is non-secret – called “The Charge.” It’s supposed to take the form of instruction or exhortation to the youngsters. I must admit that I can’t remember anything about the charge at my initiation, or who delivered it, so in the long run I suppose it’s not very consequential.

But it occurs to me that it would be the perfect venue in which to not only speak frankly about the benefits of college and brotherhood, but to unpack whatever general life wisdom I’ve accumulated thus far.

I was never very popular and I’ll never be famous. I didn’t have the prototypical Delta Upsilon experience and my tether to those days and those people is stretched thin, at best. I would never ask to speak and they would never think to invite me. This is not an entreaty or a fishing expedition.

It’s just a daydream. And this is what it would sound like:


* * * * *


Hello, everyone. My name is Jason Hammersla, 1999 graduate and member of Nu Class. I’d like to thank the brotherhood and alumni leadership for the invitation to speak here today and for the warm reception I’ve received.1

I’m a native Rochesterian but I come here from Washington DC, where I’m the communications director for a modestly-sized trade association, working on health care and retirement savings policy. It is said that “if you want a friend in Washington, get a dog.”2 I’m allergic to dogs, so I couldn’t be more pleased to be back here in my hometown and at my alma mater, where friends are easy to come by.

I should admit that in my time here I used to be known as a “satellite brother.” Perhaps this is still a familiar colloquialism; a satellite brother is one who is a part of the fraternity but never really at the center of what’s going on. They don’t live in the common housing, and they’re invisible at parties. They exist on the periphery: intermittently visible, vaguely exotic.

Satellites, by their nature, are held in the gravitational embrace of something larger than itself. And as gravity fades and their orbit expands, they gain the invaluable benefit of perspective. I speak to you today from 200,000 feet above sea level.

These are fractious times. Nowhere is this truer than in my adoptive home, our nation’s capital, where our duly elected representatives too readily employ the art of war to vilify their opponents, undermine their intentions and demonize their ideas. There is a vacuum of leadership in our world today, and nature abhors a vacuum.

So it is particularly heartening to consecrate and celebrate the ascension of these young men to a higher standard. For as much as a university education is an avenue for individual improvement, the university experience is about development as a member of civilized society. And the fraternal experience, at its marrow, is about development of men into leaders by example as well as by title. This is what the Rochester chapter proudly refers to as “building better men.”

I acknowledge that the word “man” and manhood have become bound up with, and weighted down by, conventional gender roles, pop psychology and quasi-Darwinian competition. For all its accumulated freight, people throw the word around capriciously. Be a man. Take it like a man. Stick it to the man. Man up. Man down. Man overboard. Who’s the man? You’re the man.3

For these purposes, at least, let us think about the word “man” in a broader way – as a simple abbreviation of the word “human.” And in that light, the existential inquiry becomes even more profound: what kind of man am I? What kind of man am I going to be?4

Under this roof we try to answer those questions through the advocacy of certain key principles, as espoused in The Cornerstone, Delta Upsilon’s Guide to College and Beyond:

- The Promotion of Friendship
- The Development of Character
- The Diffusion of Liberal Culture, and
- The Advancement of Justice

There is an old Hebrew word some of you may have heard before, “shibboleth.” Its original, literal translation is some kind of “grain plant,” but it is now commonly used a reference to an Old Testament story in which the people of Giliad used the word as a means of identifying trespassers from Ephraim. The Ephramite dialect didn’t include the “sh” sound, so when the Gileadites asked them to pronounce the word, it came out “thibboleth,” and so they were promptly drowned in a nearby river. And so “shibboleth” has come to mean “a practice or saying that is uniquely distinctive of a certain group.”

The four principles are your new shibboleth, not so much guidelines as they are prerequisites of fellowship. This is why we have no need for a secret handshake. If you didn’t believe in these things already, you would not be here now.

But there is another part of the Delta Upsilon canon that sets forth a more prescriptive set of ideals, as described in the associate member manual and passed down for generations from big to little brothers. They are as follows:

- A Delta U must be an introspective man.
- A Delta U must be a thinking man.
- A Delta U must be creative man.
- A Delta U must be a man of action.

And we take this to heart. Often, we end up inadvertently “choosing” our favorite of these labels, whether to justify our predispositions or rectify our perceived weaknesses. I always found it amusing that guys seem to fixate on that last one, “a man of action.” Everybody always wanted to be a “man of action,” probably because it sounds the sexiest, most like a stud or a superhero. “A man of action.” That’s Bruce Willis, John Wayne, Teddy Roosevelt. It is, I suppose, the most manly of these men. Nobody ever got laid by being an introspective man.

Believe me.

But eventually, you come to learn that this is obviously a false choice. They’re all the same person.

You can’t be an introspective man without being a thinking man, because then what are you doing? Introspection without thought – whether it’s getting high or getting lost – is no better than sleep.

You can’t really be a thinking man without being a creative man, because it’s the creativity that allows you to stretch boundaries, to challenge conventions and ask “what if.” As Delta Upsilon Brother and two-time Nobel Laureate Linus Pauling once said, “The best way to have a good idea is to have a lot of ideas.”

You can’t be a creative man without being a man of action, because it takes work and will and determination to bring about creation.

And action without introspection? That’s just being a spaz.5

So: introspective man, thinking man, creative man, man of action – this is not a menu, or a checklist. It’s a roadmap, with each step compelling you to the next. Congratulations to you, my newest brothers, for taking your first step on this path. You are to be commended for their perseverance in reaching this point.

Perhaps your decision to join Delta Upsilon has not come without cost. Sacrifice is a part of any life choice, but it is another guiding principle of this house that we do not ask any person to surrender their self-respect. Assuming this is the same non-hazing chapter of the same non-secret fraternity that I left behind, they have not had to endure the stereotypical – and, hopefully, antiquated – indignities and humiliations we instinctively associate with the fraternity system.

Indeed, as some of the more insidious elements of fraternal life have been purified by sunlight, so also has that sunlight tarnished the image of a Greek man, or woman, as the archetype of collegiate ideals.

And so these new brothers have had to tolerate a different, and not altogether unironic, kind of struggle: they have to put up with other people giving them crap about being in a fraternity. From sad-but-true news briefs and Hollywood underdog bromides, the populace at large –perhaps some in this room – has inherited a partially informed skepticism about what we do here.

They think we take ourselves too seriously. They think we don’t take anything else seriously enough. They remember our mistakes. They dismiss our accomplishments. They attend our parties, enjoy our refreshments and laugh at us behind our backs. They accuse us of buying our friends.

It’s not the friends we’re buying. But I’ll get back to that in a minute.

I joined the fraternity in the fall of my freshman year, 1995. And in my four years as an undergraduate there wasn’t a semester that went by that I didn’t wonder if it was the right decision.

At 18 years old I was a nerd caricature. Self-conscious, awkward and bookish – not even really smart, just bookish. Weirdly polite. Politely weird. I was the kind of guy who did really well with parents, teachers and administrators. But in acutely social situations, I turned into wallpaper. What would a fraternity do with me?

And what would a fraternity do for me? As an undergraduate clinical psychology major and aspiring therapist, I had little need for future business connections. I was already close to home and living in special-interest housing, so I wasn’t seeking another surrogate family. I had a girlfriend and I didn’t drink, so access to girls and parties wasn’t of much benefit.

I attended my first rush event in the Friel Lounge mainly because I didn’t have anything else to do; if cable television had been available on campus then, I probably would have been watching The Simpsons instead. And might possibly be watching The Simpsons now.

Throughout the rush experience, I connected with several of the brothers on a personal level and I was appropriately impressed by the civic and academic leadership: Students’ Association senators, Campus Times editors, National Merit Scholars, Rochester Early Medical Scholars, male cheerleaders. That’s straight out of the fraternity rush handbook: sell your brotherhood as a collection of charming overachievers.

But what I found most enticing – what sold me – was the unspoken, maybe accidental idea that when you bring a diverse group of people together, you can accomplish big things. Even the most introspective man of action can’t do big things by himself. He needs a team.

Delta Upsilon Brother Kurt Vonnegut created, in my favorite novel, Cat’s Cradle, a fictional religion-slash-philosophy called Bokononism. Followers believe that humanity “is organized into teams, teams that do God’s will without ever discovering what they are doing.” Such a team is called a karass. Vonnegut writes that one can try to discover the limits of their karass and the nature of the work that God has had it do ... but such investigations are bound to be incomplete.

It may be that Delta Upsilon is my karass. It could be that this very moment is the result of all that work. I wish I had known; I could have avoided so much exercise.

Along the way I certainly had my unforgettable brotherhood experiences, like pranks and road trips and wacky adventures. I have memories so rich and deep that I can still smell them. Most speakers and most charges will urge you to relish those moments, savor your youth, seize the day, blah blah blah. Okay, yes, definitely, do that.

I’m going to tell you what’s really important, what your dues are actually paying for: chapter meetings.

Here’s the big, dirty secret about Greek Life: the friendships, the parties, the fun stuff – you can get that anywhere. You don’t really need a fraternity for that. What Delta Upsilon offers is an opportunity for you to be a part of – and take responsibility for – something more important than yourself. It’s an active, participatory process, and it takes shape in the form of the chapter meeting.

Once a week, these guys spend the last flickering embers of their weekend in an antiseptic classroom somewhere, conducting the mundane, mechanical operation of the fraternity.6

They take roll. You probably thought, when you came to college, where most classes seem purely optional, that your days of roll call were over. In time, your compulsory attendance at these meetings will seem like something between a privilege and a punishment.

They comport themselves according to Robert’s Rules of Order and Parliamentary Procedure, a framework so arcane and labyrinthine that you can never really be sure if the president is just making things up. Each week, someone will unveil a new procedural maneuver to cut off debate; in response, someone in the brotherhood at large will, with all civility and respect, introduce a resolution instructing the president to eat his gavel.

They argue about trivial things, like whether this year’s rush T-shirt should be black or blue, or whether they should be buying traditional or barbeque-flavored potato chips for the Mardi Gras party. At some point during these ridiculous discussions, you will find yourself so bitterly frustrated by the guy sitting next to you right now that you begin to wonder if his acceptance to this school was a clerical error. Within two hours, you will have realized how stupid the argument was, and within 24 hours, you will have forgotten about the issue entirely.

They argue about important things, like budgets and dues and academic standards and risk management. There will be a handful of decisions every semester that affect this fraternity’s lifeblood and legacy. You will have to choose between the impassioned argument of this guy you respect, who says this thing, and this other guy you respect, who says this other thing. And you will accept the consequences of not only your choice, but the choices of your peers.

It can be an ugly, soul-crushing exercise. In Washington, we call it “making the sausage,” under the premise that nobody wants to see sausage or laws being made. But this experience is absolutely essential to the development of thoughtful citizenship and leadership. Because when you are tired and frustrated and bored and despairing, that is when your character is exposed. That is the man you are.

And when our founding principles – friendship, character, culture, justice – and our prescriptions – introspection, thought, creativity, action – are applied in those moments, that is the foundation of leadership. That is how you do big things. And that is how we build better men.

You know, I get frustrated when I hear people, usually politicians, say that “Washington is broken.” Certainly, our government has many problems, some institutional and some circumstantial. It doesn’t always do what we want it to do, and it doesn’t always do it efficiently. But it does what it’s supposed to do, which is take the will of the people and convert it into the rule of law. It’s not “broken,” it works. It’s just messy. And, as with any piece of complicated machinery, the operators need to know what they’re doing.

Someday, you will be those operators. Government, like this fraternity, like life, is just a series of meetings, and we are counting on you to show up. I ask you to be present for those meetings, watch and listen at those meetings, speak conscientiously at those meetings. Take what you learn in those meetings – take what you learn about yourself in those meetings, and apply it the outside world as teachers, as titans of industry, as parents, as leaders.

In the words of brother and president James A. Garfield, “I mean to make myself a man, and if I succeed in that, I shall succeed in everything else.”

Thank you very much. Congratulations, Dikaia Upotheke, and justice for all.
Link1 comment|Vent your spleen

Annual Baseball Predictions and Predilections [Mar. 31st, 2011|10:37 am]
"Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future, concentrate the mind on the present moment."
- The Buddha

Predictions
From most wins to fewest wins, including postseason

Boston Red Sox
Atlanta Braves
Tampa Bay Rays
Philadelphia Phillies
San Francisco Giants
New York Yankees
Los Angeles Dodgers
Detroit Tigers
Chicago Cubs
Milwaukee Brewers
Oakland Athletics
Texas Rangers
Chicago White Sox
Cincinnati Reds
St. Louis Cardinals
Minnesota Twins
Colorado Rockies
New York Mets
Toronto Blue Jays
Florida Marlins
Los Angeles Angels
Seattle Mariners
Washington Nationals
San Diego Padres
Baltimore Orioles
Cleveland Indians
Houston Astros
Kansas City Royals
Arizona Diamondbacks
Pittsburgh Pirates


Predilections
From most-favorite to least-favorite

Oakland Athletics
Tampa Bay Rays
Minnesota Twins
Milwaukee Brewers
Pittsburgh Pirates
San Diego Padres
Washington Nationals
Atlanta Braves
Detroit Tigers
St. Louis Cardinals
Chicago Cubs
Toronto Blue Jays
Philadelphia Phillies
Baltimore Orioles
Colorado Rockies
Kansas City Royals
Cleveland Indians
Los Angeles Dodgers
Cincinnati Reds
Florida Marlins
Arizona Diamondbacks
Houston Astros
New York Mets
Seattle Mariners
Boston Red Sox
Texas Rangers
Chicago White Sox
Los Angeles Angels
San Francisco Giants
New York Yankees
LinkVent your spleen

Rally (Re)Cap [Oct. 30th, 2010|05:21 pm]
"Free speech means the right to shout 'theatre' in a crowded fire."
- Abbie Hoffman


There was a rally this past weekend in Washington D.C., you might have heard. Or you might have guessed. There is a rally pretty much every weekend in Washington D.C., which serves as a sort of national soap box for every deeply felt, half-cocked, self-righteous grievance ranging from the socio-political to the metaphysiological. On Sunday evenings around here, the public wastebins are stuffed with picket signs.

This is the essence of American democracy. Whack-jobs with megaphones are the product and the price of capital-F Freedom. It is why living here -- in this nation and in this city -- is both inspiring and sort of depressing.

This latest rally was the brainchild of Comedy Central's Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert,[1] the Waldorf-and-Statler of modern American commentary. And the idea of their "Rally to Restore Sanity" was to sound the call for people cut back on the poisonous vitriol and villification that seems to characterize 21st century political discourse.

And of course, this is the essence of irony. "If we amplify everything, we hear nothing," Stewart said, via microphone-and-sound-system to 200,000 people on the mall, plus another two million or so households watching the nationwide simulcast. His point seems to be that free speech is great, as long as you don't say anything obnoxious and/or untrue. Unless you're a snarky comedian.

This is not really new terrain for Stewart, who has earned a sterling reputation for incisive, trenchant criticism of politicians and the media, quite clearly positioning himself as an eloquent voice of reason within the progressive movement. But then, when pressed on his civic philosophy and responsibilities, he shrugs his shoulders and says "It's just a fake news show! It's not real! Don't listen to me!"[2]

And on Saturday, October 30, he gathered his followers on the National Mall and asked them to be nicer to each other. That's cool. Naive, yes, but in an adorable sort of way. It was only nine blocks from my home, so I went to be a part of it.

People have been asking me what it was like to be there. In a word: crowded. To simulate the experience, you can go into your backyard and dig a hole six feet into the ground and 18 inches in diameter. Get in the hole and then try to listen to your neighbor's TV.

You can view the entire rally/show in its entirety by clicking here. I won't bother offering any commentary on that, since I spent most of the time contorting my body so that I could try to listen to it. But this is my shorthand diary of the journey.

11:35 a.m. Meet up with D.I.L. and M.R.L. at the Metro Station. They were delayed getting in from the east side of the city because the trains were so packed full of rallygoers that they couldn't accomodate any more rallygoers.

11:45 a.m. Our first view of the city's omnipresent food trucks. We quickly dismiss the idea of a quick bite, as it was difficult to tell where the Red Hook Lobster Truck line ended and where the rally crowd began.

11:50 a.m. We enter the breach, assimilating with a hodge-podge of aging hippies, frat boys, left-wing activists, smart-ass hipsters, disaffected government flunkies and lost children.



People, people everywhere, and not a thought to think.



12:00 noon We are awash in a sea of these people. It takes us approximately ten minutes to move two feet.

12:05 p.m. We were supposed to meet up with J.R.R. and C.R. somewhere near 7th Street and Madison, but we are having difficulty keeping track of each other, much less finding anyone else in the crowd. He sends a text message to D.I.L. indicating that he is near "the big tree." Well, that narrows it down.

12:10 p.m. We are packed in like molecules of iron, and the guy behind me tells me he needs to get in front of me because "his friends are up there." Informed that there is zero space for him to get in front of me, he adopts a tone in stark contrast with the ethos of the rally he was attending.

12:15 p.m. An older woman inadvertently hits me in the head with a sign and apologizes profusely. "No problem," I reply. "It's my fault for coming down here."

We saw many, many signs pass through our small section of the crowd, embodying a number of different approaches:
- Meta ("This is a sign")
- Cinematic ("I'm calmer than you are, dude")
- Parodic ("Don't Read to Me", in the manner of "Don't Tread on Me")
- Ironic (a Christine O'Donnell campaign sign, with the oblique aside, "No Whacking")
- Topical ("My rent is reasonable")
- Worldly (Something in Arabic)
- Verbose ("Give me false dichotomies or give me death")
- Creepy ("When there is no more room in Hell, the dead will walk the Earth")

Don't take my word for it. This is just one of many other catalogues of interesting signage.

12:20 p.m. We reach the spot that would be our spot for the entirety of the show. If I stand on my tippy-toes and crain my neck, I can sort of make out the corner of a jumbotron screen.



This was me hoisting my camera aloft and snapping a photo of whatever.
If only I had been eight feet tall, I could have had this spectacular view.



12:30 p.m. Some guy on stage tries to start the wave. Of course, he is the only person on the mall who can actually see it.

12:40 p.m. In what would become a recurring problem, an ambulance proceeds up the street where there are 15,000 people already standing. When we somehow manage to squeeze in to let the ambulance pass, the empty space is rapidly filled by new people. This is roughly the same principle underlying plate tectonics, only that process is considerably less sweaty.

12:45 p.m. Someone is saying something on the microphone. Everyone asks the person next to them, "what is he saying?" which only makes our area louder and makes it more difficult to hear the person on the microphone, which makes the crowd even more vocally irritated.

12:50 p.m. Chants of "Lou-der! Lou-der!"

1:00 p.m. The show begins. My leg muscles begin the process of atrophy.

Throughout the show there were the usual oddities -- a baby stroller surfing the crowd, people climbing traffic lights, people threatening to pee right there if people didn't let them through -- just your basic Americana.

One of these days I'll actually watch the video so I can see what I was standing through. (I'll probably skip over the Sheryl Crow and Kid Rock train wreck.)

Election day is this Tuesday, so I'm not expecting sanity to be restored any time very soon. I admire the sentiment, I guess, I just think we should set our sights a little lower. How about a rally to restore sanitation? That would take care of all the signs, banners and buttons now littering the mall.
Link5 comments|Vent your spleen

Chin Music [Sep. 10th, 2010|11:29 am]
"I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures."
- Earl Warren


It is both curious and totally appropriate that professional sports leagues use the word "season" to refer to the period between beginning and end.

Curious because these leagues invariably span numerous seasons: professional football debuted last night, just as summer started to give way to crisp autumn, and will not finish until we are up to our asses in winter. Baseball begins each year with Spring Training, cruises through The Dog Days of Summer and ends with the Fall Classic. The NBA starts every year in November and, including the playoffs, concludes a full year and a half later.

And it is totally appropriate because we look forward to each opening day with agitated anticipation, only to find that the end sneaks up on us. Likewise we breathlessly await the first cool breezes of fall, or the cozy hearth of winter, or spring flowers or summer sunshine.

And at the end of each, we feel ourselves die a little inside, because we know that we only have so many seasons in us, and another one is gone.

* * *

The 2010 season will come to a close this weekend for the Harry's Full Disclosure softball team (HFD), when the U.S. House Softball League sponsors its annual championship tournament. For every team but one, the final out will be disappointing.

It will be particularly disappointing for HFD after the team's most successful regular season in almost a decade, as measured not only in terms of on-field results but in more nebulous and hard-to-quantify ways as well. After several years in which team leadership occasionally struggled to field a minimum of nine healthy bodies, the 2010 team was legion, often more than a dozen strong and unanimously wearing the official uniform. Postgame carousing -- the bellwether of team chemistry -- was strongly encouraged, widely practiced and routinely spirited.

For these reasons the 2010 season will be considered an indisputable success no matter how disappointing is the finish. We the players harbor no illusions of grandeur; one teammate recently mused that we are "the least-confident No. 16 seed ever" in the tournament. We are, in the largest sense, just happy to be there. Last year we didn't even get a tournament bid.

But there is also the sense that this might be the best chance we ever have to do something exciting and memorable on this stage. And a championship would be even sweeter if we could achieve it with this particular HFD team that has become so close. Nobody knows if 2011 will be the same. We don't want this season to end.

But everything ends.

* * *

There are a lot of great and positive things about sports, especially (and almost exclusively) recreational sports: camaraderie, teamwork, exercise, leadership by acclamation, friendly competition, the joy of play, the attention to detail, the appreciation of the gestalt, the bright euphoria in victory, the warm sympathy in defeat, the satisfaction of full effort and the ungoverned exuberance of battle for battle's sake.

The trouble with sports, especially (and almost exclusively) recreational sports, is that the individual players seldom agree on what is the most important of those things. Each teammate's individual motivations may add up to a common cause, but problems inevitably crop up when a person who is in it clearly "for the bright euphoria in victory" crosses paths with a person who is in it simply "for the joy of play".

By contrast, the great thing about professional and pro-amateur (i.e. NCAA) sports is that everyone -- owners, players, popcorn vendors -- tacitly agrees on what is really happening. Pro and pro-am sports is a business, a capitalization of athletics through an upfront transaction of cash-for-entertainment, contingent on the leagues' ability to provide certainty in the form of Winners and Losers. Which is to say, in the parlance of contract negotiation, "It's a business." In fact, it's all very postmodern -- taking something simple and beautiful, self-awarely converting it to commerce, and celebrating it with pageantry.

There is very often a pull between the philosophies of the recreational and those of the professional. Some people want professional athletes and team owners to embrace the game at the core of The Game, to place sportsmanship and loyalty and enthusiasm and other romantic notions above typical buyer/seller relations. And there are others who are either so enchanted by the spirit of recreational athletics or so thirsty for power that they will seek to formalize and professionalize the recreation.

* * *

For the record: Harry's Full Disclosure went 10-2 in the regular season, including wins in each of the first seven games of the year. That comes to a .833 winning percentage, tied for seventh in the 117-team league. When you factor in the strength of schedule and the quality of the competition and the quality of the competition's competition and all kinds of hypotenuses or whatever, we finished with a Ratings Power Index (RPI) of .605. In the U.S. House Softball League's Selection Show, we were awarded the 16th seed (and a first-round bye) in a field of 48.

But if you want to look for blemishes on that record, they're easy to find: We didn't play any team in the top 25, and only faced two teams in the top 55 (and lost to one of them). Half of our wins were by four runs or fewer. We lost our last game of the season in a listless, powerless effort against a team that didn't even make the tournament.

The softball cognoscenti has taken notice of these flaws, if the chatter on the "smack talk" section of the league's message boards is any indication. For example:

Someone named The Softball Guy predicts on his "Unofficial House Softball League Blog" that "Harry's Full Disclosure gets knocked off by the Hired Guns" (the No. 17 seed and our likely opponent in the second round).

Someone named "Sonny" agrees: "Harry's Full Disclosure: Having not played a single team in the top 25, the Hired Guns will be too much to handle." Sonny and The Softball Guy may have a point; The Hired Guns went 12-4 with a substantially larger run differential and played two powerhouse teams pretty close. It's also possible that Sonny and the Softball Guy are the same person.

Someone named "The Dude" proclaims that "Owego in sweet 16 is on par with Harrys Full Disclosure? No chance sir, not all sweet 16 matchups are created equally." I confess that I have no idea what this means. It could even be a compliment. The Dude certainly seems to know what he is talking about.

They all must know what they are talking about because some members of this loquatious subculture post messages to these boards every five minutes. They think about this stuff a lot. It should not surprise readers inside or outside of D.C. that many of these individuals are employed by the federal government.

* * *

In Major League Baseball, just in time for the final stretch of the pennant races, teams are permitted to expand their rosters from 25 to 40 players beginning in early September. There isn't an overriding, perfect reason for this, though there are several smaller rationalizations: the minor league season ends in August and they want to bring the kids up for a cup of coffee, it allows teams that are mathematically eliminated to give their fans something new and exciting to watch, and for playoff teams it helps give the weary regulars an occasional rest before the televised games begin.

But there is a basic flaw in this tradition: during the most critical phase of the season, teams are forced to play under fundamentally different rules than are in place the rest of the year. Baseball begins as one game and ends as something else.

Endings are like that.

* * *

In the U.S. House Softball League, tournament softball is so different than regular-season softball that it is only nominally the same sport. It's like suddenly graduating from ping-pong to tennis.

Regular-season games are usually played on patchy, lumpy, unkempt plots of land dotted with tourists and sprinkler mains; tournament games are played on well-manicured fields with fine dirt infields and deep fences.

Regular season games are played with whomever can show up on that given weeknight, often including mercenary ringers, friends-of-friends and strangers off the street, and managers usually try to let everyone play an inning or two; tournament games are strictly limited to preestablished 25-man rosters and played on weekend mornings when there's no competition with night classes or overtime, and the drive to win naturally compels managers to play their best ten swingers.

Perhaps most importantly, regular-season play operates with no strike zone and a relaxed pitch-until-they-hit-it philosophy; tournament play operates with umpires and each at-bat starts with a 1-1 count. (Not only can you walk and strike out in the tournament, but there is a walk rule that rivals the Hawley-Smoot tariff in terms of legal complexity.)

This presents a specific challenge for me, as the team's pitcher. My role has suddenly changed from facilitator to competitor. And I, more than any other player, hold the team's fortune in my hand. I am not the best player on our roster. But I have the power to end our season.

Everything ends, somehow.

* * *

I told my father the other day how nervous I was about playing in the tournament. About the whole new ballgame. About the pressure to preserve the great season. He already knew what I was feeling.

My dad was a real athlete in his younger days -- until his skills topped out in college, anyway -- and I suspect that he viewed his first-born son as the successor to that talent.

He was cured of that notion early on in my Little League career, which could arguably be referred to as a wave of crime against sport itself. I was at once flabby and uncoordinated, alternately frustrated and disinterested. Under pressure, I collapsed on myself spectacularly, like a dying star. But the only time I ever felt my father's disappointment was when he didn't think I was trying hard or having fun.

And so that's what he told me the other day. "Just do your best and have fun." And that means I'll just have to forget about the umpire and the commisioners and the pressure and the doubters and all that stuff, and remember the thing that I'm trying to hold on to in the first place. So:

Here's to the "play" in playing softball. Here's to my teammates. And here's to end of this season, and the beginning of the next.

Seeing the end coming doesn't make it any easier.
LinkVent your spleen

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]